Daily Archives: April 24, 2011

C Rulon: Birth Control (History, Religion & Moral Zealotry)

By Charles L. Rulon
Emeritus, Life & Health Sciences
Long Beach City College ([email protected])

Introduction

Planned Parenthood and other reproductive care organizations in the U.S. provide information and birth control to about 5 million women a year at over 4,600 health centers. Their efforts prevent over one million unintended pregnancies and several hundred thousand abortions a year. Furthermore, estimates are that for every $1 spent by our taxes for contraceptive care, taxpayers save around $4 in Medicaid costs for mother and baby in just the first year. Only about 3% of Planned Parenthood funds go toward legal abortions, none of which comes from taxes.

Yet in the spring of 2011, the GOP budget bill in Congress cut all funds to Planned Parenthood and these other reproductive care facilities. In Congress, religious, patriarchal and Libertarian ideologies are trumping fiscal responsibility, plus ecological sanity, plus humanistic compassion for the less fortunate. Thus, I thought that a quick historical review of birth control would be relevant at this time.

Early birth control attempts

With the discovery of agriculture came the accumulation of possessions, including wives and children. Dominant jealous males could never be sure they were the bio­logical fathers of the children they raised. So they created laws, customs and reli­gions which stressed the con­trol of female sexu­ali­ty. Virginity became prized; adultery by the wife often meant death.

Still, unwanted pregnancies were a persistent problem. Accord­ing to histor­ians Will and Ariel Durant (The Lessons of History -1968) most men wanted many chil­d­ren while their wives didn’t. Women secretly rebelled and have used an end­less vari­ety of means to reduce the burdens of preg­nancy—everything from magi­cal incan­­ta­­tions and pray­­ers, to extremely danger­ous abor­tions, to killing their new­borns. Through trial and error the early Greeks and Romans had com­pil­ed a num­ber of partially successful contra­ceptive tech­niques.

Yet, with the decline of the Roman world some 1600 years ago, much of this accumulated knowledge disappeared for more than a thousand years. The authorities during these long “Dark Ages” were often military men, or men of the cloth. The answers to all im­por­tant ques­tions were to be found in the Bible and other sacred commu­nica­tions with God. Piety was prized over advancing worldly knowledge; faith was consid­ered more reli­­able than reason. Ques­tion­ing the Church’s basic tenets was reli­gious heresy. Contraception was forbidden because God created sex for procreation only and because contraception would allow women to cheat on their husbands with­out getting caught. Life was often miserable, brutish and short.

Finally by the early 1800s, a growing body of informa­tion began to once again exist on how to prevent unwanted preg­nancies. By the mid-1800s Good­year’s discovery of vulcan­ized rubber led to mass-produced condoms and diaphragms. As printing and photographic technologies im­proved and as literacy increased, pamphlets on birth control began to be published and widely cir­culated. But powerful opposition grew.

Moral zealotry and patriarchal politics

In Victorian America proper women were expected to relinquish all claims to any source of sexual enjoyment, since “only whores and harridans were interested in sex.” Women were continuously bur­dened with unwanted pregnancies. Powerful patriarchal and reli­gious forces in league with zealous moral crusaders opposed birth control. One such moral crusader was Anthony Comstock. He was able to convince a like-minded U.S. Congress in 1873 to order the U.S. Post Office to confis­cate all “obscene” lit­erature in the mail. This included any information describ­ing birth control. By 1905, this law had been extend­ed by Congress to also punish the receivers of any birth control information. Com­stock personally con­duc­ted a reign of moral terror in the United States for some 40 years. He was appointed as a special agent for the U.S. Post Office and given the right to open any mail for inspection and to personally decide what was ob­scene. Entrapment was one of his favor­ite methods. Com­stock would regularly write physicians pretending to be a sick and frail mother of many children and begging the doctor for contraceptive informa­tion. Those doctors who responded were arrested and freq­uently fined or imprisoned.

Margaret Sanger

Given all the powerful religious, patriarchal and political forces against birth control, how did it ever become legal? Partly because of the tireless efforts of people like Margaret Sanger (1879-1966). As a nurse, Sanger became hor­ri­­fied at the plight of poor women who ex­peri­enced con­tinuous risks of preg­nancy and who often re­sorted to dang­er­ous and frequently self-in­duced abor­­tions. Sanger could see no reason why women should have to sacrifice sex in order to avoid unwanted preg­nan­cies. To make matters worse, the law required that mar­ried women must give themselves sexually to their hus­bands or risk los­ing financial support. This made abstinence by women difficult, if not impos­sible.

In 1914, authorities confiscated a pamphlet called Family Limitation that Sanger had published discussing sex education, venereal diseases and contraception. Faced with nine counts of mailing obscene material and a possible 45 years in jail, Sanger fled to Europe. (This pamph­let was eventually translated into 13 languages and had a total circulation of over 10 million.)

While in Europe Sanger’s quest for a safe birth control technique led her to the Netherlands where the dia­phragm had been developed and was dispensed by doctors and mid­wives. It was simple, inex­pensive and fairly reliable. Sanger smuggled the diaphragm back to the United States when she returned in 1916. By then her birth control efforts had become well-known and widely supported, so the govern­ment decided not to prosecute.

In the same year, Sanger and her sister opened the first birth control clinic in the U.S. It was in Brooklyn. On the first day, a line of women stretched around the block. Close to five hun­dred women were seen in the first 10 days. Sanger and her sister were then arrested for “maintain­ing a public nuisance,” the clinic was closed and they each spent 30 days in jail. The New York State Supreme Court upheld their convictions.

Sanger bat­tled the wide-spread mentality which equated birth control with obscenity and sin. She battled patriarchal politicians, reli­­gious leaders and moral zealots. She battled the apathy of the medi­cal pro­fession. She fought numerous court battles and played a key role in the early Planned Parent­hood move­ment. Through all of this, Sanger repeat­edly argued that women must have the right to con­trol their own bodies, their own repro­ductive history. Other­­wise they are reduced to little more than government con­trolled asexual reproductive ma­ch­ines. Sanger was deter­mined, as she put it, “to put the United States of America upon the map of the civilized world!”

The backlash against Margaret Sanger was vicious and is still found on anti-birth control web sites. She was called a racist and proponent of orgies. She was accused of advocating the abortions of Blacks. She was even accused of inspiring Adolf Hitler to murder socially undesirable people.

Contraception and the AMA

In the 1920s contra­ception came under the strict control of the medical pro­fes­sion, which initially made little attempt to change the restrictive laws and also avoided clin­ical studies of contra­ceptives. Condoms could only be sold for the preven­tion of disease. Thus, contraceptive quackery and bogus formulas became big business. By 1934, only one medi­cal school in six was re­ported as giv­ing any regu­lar in­struction on contracep­tion. Finally in 1935 a federal court ruled that con­tra­ceptives could be legally adver­tised and ship­ped through the mail. Two years later the AMA finally recog­nized birth control as part of med­i­cal service. In 1938 an organization which came to be known as the Planned Parenthood Feder­ation of America was formed. Yet it still took another decade for contraceptives to become reasonably available and medically and ethically accepted.

The Pill

In 1960 mother­hood was still being preached in the pulpit as the noblest calling for women. Marriage was for the primary purpose of rearing a family. A childless couple or a one child family was still seen as a sorrow or a sign of selfishness. Then in 1960 the first birth control pill was introduced. With a failure rate under 5%, the pill seemed the perfect equalizer, free­ing women for the first time in history to enjoy sex with minimal fear of pregnancy. Many social observers have argued that the “pill” was crucial to the rise of the modern feminist movement. In a society that made child care a female responsibility, a woman who could not predict when she would bear children was in no position to make serious plans about anything else. Even if she wanted children and cherished the role of mother, she lacked real control over the course of her life.

Major birth control laws

In 1966 the U.S. Supreme Court over­turned anti-birth control laws still remaining in three states, which outlawed contra­ception for married couples. By so doing, the Court was in effect confirming that married couples had the constitu­tional right a) to not have child­ren at all and b) to have sex for reasons other than pro­cre­ation. Still, it took another six years (1972) be­fore the Court extended its ruling to single adults.

Abortion laws began to change in sev­­eral states. By 1972, an esti­mated 600,000 le­gal abortions had been per­form­ed in the U.S., most­ly in New York City. Then in 1973 came the famous Roe v. Wade deci­sion. The U.S. Supreme Court by a vote of 7 to 2 le­g­al­ized abortion through­out our coun­try. But primarily because of a never-ending powerful Catholic Church backlash, legal abortions today are only being performed in 13% of all the counties in the U.S.

In 1999 emergency contraception (the “morning-after pill”) was finally approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for women 18 and over with a doctor’s prescription. In 2006 it became available without a prescription and in 2009 the age was lowered to 17. Girls under 17 can obtain a prescription. In Darfur in 2007 Amnesty Inter­national, an international human rights organi­zation, sup­ported the right of women who had been gang raped to have access to emergency contra­ception. In response, the Vatican sus­pen­d­ed all finan­cial aid to Amnesty International and called upon Catho­lics world­wide to boycott the organization.

Some final thoughts

In poor countries infan­­ticide and child abandon­ment are still common. Each year, un­plan­ned preg­nan­cies result in hun­dreds of thou­sands of deaths from botched abor­tions and from pregnancy-related complications, with millions more being rushed to hospitals. Tens of millions of unplan­ned children are born. Family units are weakened. Poverty increases. Untold millions of children are aban­doned to the streets. Millions die each year from malnutrition, con­tam­i­nated water and cur­able dis­­eases. World popu­­la­tion continues to grow. Ecological and social systems continue to disintegrate.

Thus, an investment in the education and the economic and reproductive health of women would provide one of the greatest ben­e­fits to huma­n­ity imag­inable. What other mea­sure could make such a con­tribu­tion to the health and well being of so many families and to the social and ecological stability of global societies, yet only cost each of us in the affluent world a few dollars a year? The trivialization of women’s issues as something tan­gential to the “really important issues” is really the trivialization of humanity itself.

“Empowerment of women is vital to achieving peace and security, improved living stand­ards and respect for human rights.”

— Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, U.N. (2007)

C Rulon: Birth Control (Political, Patriarchal & Religious Opposition)

By Charles L. Rulon
Emeritus, Life & Health Sciences
Long Beach City College ([email protected])

Powerful MEN still oppose birth control

Historically (and still today) there remain many reasons held by men in political and religious power for opposing the R & D of better contraceptives, birth control education, and the dispensing of birth control methods:

a. Religious/moral: Sex is a seri­ous and sac­red act reserved for re­pro­duction in marriage. Unwanted preg­nancies out­­side of marriage were divine punish­ments for illicit sex. If birth control were al­lowed, how could God punish immoral, loose women?

b. Blocking God’s plan: We all re­ceive our right to life direct­ly from God. We are all planned in His eyes. If a woman be­came pregnant it was meant to be. A baby was a gift from God. “Be fruitful and multiply,” the Bible tells us. Therefore, using birth control is interfering with God’s plan for us. It allowed hu­mans in­stead of God to de­cide when there should be con­cep­tion.

c. Reducing us to ani­mals: Scrip­ture warns us that pleas­ures of the flesh are sinful (1 Cor. 6:18-20). Birth control would encourage women to have sex just for fun and this would reduce them to mere ani­mals.[i] (Men, of course, weren’t expect­ed to control their “animal drives.”)

d. Loss of respect: Birth control could cause husbands to lose re­s­pect for their wives, considering them mere instruments of selfish en­joyment and no long­er their res­pect­ed and beloved com­pan­ions.

e. Collapse of society: Birth control could undermine social sta­bi­l­­ity. If women could have sex without fear of pregnancy, why get mar­ried in the first place? Indeed, having sex with­out worry could lead us down that slip­pery slope to pro­mis­cuity, pornography, mor­al de­cay, devi­ant sex­ual prac­tices, bro­ken homes, and finally the ulti­mate col­lapse of so­ciety.

f. Natural roles for men and women: Motherhood is the noblest calling possible for women. Mar­riage is for rearing fam­ilies and pro­vid­ing com­fortable, clean, spiritu­ally uplift­ing homes for hus­bands returning from the dog-eat-dog world. Women served best in the home and were not meant to com­pete with men for jobs, money and power. It wasn’t natural.

“The low status of women and girls is one of the most damaging, wasteful and immoral defects of society today”

—Dr. H. Mahler, former Director-General of the World Health Organization for 15 years

Current birth control battles

1984: The Reagan administration canceled all U.S. fund­ing of Inter­­national Planned Parent­hood, an organization that pro­vided family planning services to over 130 nations. Behind this decision was an agreement reached with the Vatican.[ii]

1992: The Bush administration ordered all birth control infor­mation removed from 275,000 copies of an already printed health care book being sent to federal workers because it might be seen by their children.

1993: The pope declared that using con­doms or the birth con­trol pill could be a mortal sin, even if a mar­ried couple was using con­doms because one partner had AIDS. (17 years later the pope announced that using condoms was a lesser sin than spreading AIDS.)

1994: The major­­ity of House Repub­licans voted to elimi­nate all U.S. funding for in­ter­na­tional family plan­ning programs. They also voted to exclude a number of ex­treme­ly effec­tive contraceptives (the pill, Nor­plant and the IUD) from federal health care cov­erage, claiming that these con­tracep­tives could cause abor­tions by preventing fertil­ized eggs from implan­ting in the uterus.

1995-2006: The Republicans gained control of both houses of Con­gress. Over 85 motions were passed that con­tinued to erode teen­age girls and women’s access to reproductive health services. Severe fund­ing cuts were impos­ed on U.S. family planning assistance to poor countries. The House of Representatives approved an amend­ment that would deny U.S. family planning funds to any foreign organization that even partici­pated in debates over abortion in their own countries (the global gag rule).

1997: Representative Ron Paul (R-Texas) spon­sor­ed a House amendment that would eliminate all U.S. fund­ing for inter­national family planning programs. Al­though it was even­tu­ally defeated, the major­ity of House Republicans supported it.

1998: Representative Chris Smith (R-N.J.) spon­sor­ed a House amendment that would bar federal health care plans for federal employees from pay­ing for the pill, Norplant, Depo-provera and the IUD because, he claimed, they were “baby pesti­cides.” Almost 200 mem­bers of the House sup­ported his position!

1998: The Vatican attempted to stop the distribution of the “morning after pill” to the Bos­nian Muslim women in Koso­var refu­gee camps who had just been bru­tally raped and had already lost every­thing, including their loved ones. Arch­bishop Flynn referred to the aid workers who were offer­ing these pills as perpe­tra­tors of vio­lence.

1999: House Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-Texas) claimed that youth violence was a re­sult of day care, the teaching of evol­ution, and ‘working mothers who take birth control pills.’

2000: At the United Nations Conference on Women, the Vati­can and delegates from a handful of fundamental­ist coun­tries (Libya, Al­geria, Iran, Sudan, Nicaragua and Paki­stan) blocked language that would have called for ac­cess to birth con­trol for women around the world.[iii]

2001-2008: The Bush Administration saw to it that abstinence-only sex education, despite its effectiveness being thoroughly discredited, received around $1.3 billion in funding. This funding was only available to those states that agreed to NOT teach about contraceptives as well. Eventually 25 states turned down the funding.

2002-2008: The Bush Administration withheld a total of $235 million in congressionally approved funds for the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA). The UNFPA sup­ports volun­tary family planning and reproductive health care pro­grams in 154 countries worldwide. In 2007 a record 181 U.N. member states contributed to the UNFPA.

2007: An amendment was presented in the U.S. House of Representatives that would have required one-third of all the money allocated for President Bush’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief overseas to be spent on abstinence-only programs. The amendment was narrowly defeated: Yes (200), No (226).

2007: In Darfur, mass political gang rapes had been occur­ring for some time. Amnesty Inter­national, an international human rights organi­zation, sup­ported the right of those raped women to have access to emergency contra­ception and abortion. They empha­sized that they were dedi­cated to upholding basic human rights, not specific theologies. In response, the Vatican sus­pen­d­ed all finan­cial aid to Amnesty International and called upon Catho­lics world­wide to boycott the organization.

2009: President Obama overturned the “global gag rule” and signed legislation which increased funding for international family planning to $84 million. In addition, Obama reinstated low cost birth control availability at college health centers and at some 400 clinics serving low-income women. He also moved to rescind the Bush adminis­tra­tion’s “con­science” clause which allowed pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions for contraceptives and the morning-after pill if doing so offend­ed their relig­ious beliefs or moral convictions. Not a single Republican in either the House or the Senate supported Obama.

2009: A report from Population Action Intern­atio­nal estimat­ed that more than 200 million women in the devel­op­ing world were still denied birth control, resulting in over 50 million unin­tended pregnancies, 140,000 pregnan­cy-related deaths, about 500,000 orphans, and 22 million abortions yearly. The GOP controlled U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Finance wasn’t fazed. They approved an amendment to the health care reform package that would provide $50 million through 2014 for abstinence-only education and would bar funds from being used for contra­ception education.

2011: The GOP budget bill in Congress cut all funds to Planned Parenthood and other reproductive care facilities in the U.S. These facilities provide information and birth control to about 5 million women a year at over 4,600 health centers. Each year, over one million unintended pregnancies and several hundred thousand abortions are avoided. The Guttmacher Institute has estimated that for every $1 spent by our taxes for contraceptive care, taxpayers save around $4 in Medicaid costs for mother and baby in just the first year. Only about 3% of Planned Parenthood funds go toward legal abortions, none of which comes from taxes.[iv]

Some final thoughts

We have become the only an­imal to ever be able to sepa­rate sex from pregnan­cy. Every child can now be a wanted child. Yet, power­ful anti-birth control religious and poli­tical patriarchal forces continue to be effective in redu­c­ing contra­cep­tive research, edu­­­ca­tion and avail­abil­ity. For dec­ades adver­tise­ments for con­tra­­cep­tives on primetime televi­sion have been blocked and teens across our country have not been ade­quately edu­cated about contraceptives. In­stead, they’ve been taught to “Just Say No.” As a result over one-half of all pregnancies in the U.S. are still un­planned. Our teen pregnancy rate is now two to six times higher than in the coun­tries of Western Europe.[v]

———————————————–
[i] The evolution of continuous sexual availability of human females has been con­si­dered by evolution theorists to be criti­cal for mate bonding, for female survival and for the survival of the young. In fact, non-reproductive sex is believed by some theorists to be as impor­tant for our humanity as was our mastery of fire and language. These findings are con­trary to those conserva­tive religious teachings that tell us that God only wants us to have sex in marriage for repro­duction. To have sex only when pregnancy is possible would be, indeed, to act just like an animal.

[ii]Bernstein, C. 1992. “The Holy Alliance.” Time, Feb. 24.

[iii]The Holy See and Women’s Rights: A Shadow Report on the Beijing Platform for Action and Catholic HMOs and Reproductive Health Care. Published by Catholics for Free Choice. (www.cath4choice.org)

[iv] Time, March 14, 2011, p. 66.

[v]A 2006 Columbia University study found that 88% of teenage girls who took “virginity pledges” eventually had premarital sex and were one-third less likely to use contraception when they did, making them vulnerable not only to unintended pregnancies but to sexually transmitted diseases. See .